FTC suspends enforcement of red flags medical identity theft rule
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, October 27, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has extended the red flags medical identity theft rule compliance deadline for creditors and financial institutions from November 1, 2008 to May 1, 2009, according to an October 22 announcement.
Financial institutions and creditors must have programs in place to identify, detect, and respond to patterns, practices, or specific activities that could indicate identity theft per the red flags rule, according to the FTC announcement.
The rule defines creditors as “any entity that regularly extends, renews, or continues credit; any entity that regularly arranges for the extension, renewal, or continuation of credit.” There was confusion over whether the rule, which is primarily geared toward financial institutions and other lenders, also applied to healthcare providers. Although the rule doesn’t specifically reference them, it does imply that healthcare providers may fit the legislation’s extremely broad definition of "creditor" because many permit a deferred payment of certain ongoing accounts. Essentially, providers become "creditors" when they establish payment plan.
Some entities reported being unaware they were required to comply with the rule until it was too late to be in compliance by November 1, according to the announcement. The delayed enforcement will provide additional time to implement the prescribed programs.
For more information, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Comments
0 comments on “FTC suspends enforcement of red flags medical identity theft rule ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- CHANGES COMING: Key differences in nationwide rollout
- Searched
