Q. Our state health department mails surveys to patients about their HIV status. The exterior of the envelopes indicates that the contents pertain to HIV status. What can we do to limit or prohibit the state agency from disclosing patients' HIV status?
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, October 27, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
A. If the state health department is a covered entity—and many are—it may not specify the patient’s condition on the exterior of an envelope. This violates the HIPAA privacy rule. Also, many states consider a patient’s HIV/AIDS status specially protected information. This designation makes many organizations subject to state privacy laws that prohibit the disclosure of specially protected health information to unauthorized individuals. This would prohibit the organization from printing “this pertains to HIV/AIDS” on the outside of envelopes sent to patients.
The best way to end this practice is to notify your state health department that it might be violating state and/or federal privacy laws. If this approach is unsuccessful, file a complaint with your state attorney general or governor. Also, file a privacy complaint with the OCR if your state health department is a covered entity.
Editor's note: Chris Apgar, president of Portland, OR-based Apgar & Associates, LLC, answered this question. This is not legal advice. Consult your attorney regarding legal matters.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Comments
0 comments on “Q. Our state health department mails surveys to patients about their HIV status. The exterior of the envelopes indicates that the contents pertain to HIV status. What can we do to limit or prohibit the state agency from disclosing patients' HIV status? ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- CHANGES COMING: Key differences in nationwide rollout
- Searched
