Atlanta hospital patients' outsourced data made public
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, October 20, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Human error—not hackers—is apparently to blame in a security breach that affected 45 Grady Memorial Hospital patients, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported September 23.
Hospital officials mistakenly thought the records were on a secure Web site, but they were accessible to the public for several weeks in July, according to the article. A hospital spokesman said the information is no longer publicly accessible.
Internet security experts say an increasing amount of information is inadvertently slipping onto unsecured sites, the newspaper reported. “Very few keystrokes can make a system that is secure become unsecure,” Tom Dager, director of information technology at SecureWorks, an Atlanta information security firm, told the newspaper. He said that data breaches due to human error are becoming more common than breaches caused by hackers.
The situation at Grady Memorial Hospital highlights the risk of outsourcing work, Dager told the newspaper. The hospital had outsourced transcription to a Marietta, GA, corporation, which in turn outsourced the work to a Nevada company, which outsourced it to a firm in India, which let the information slip onto the Internet
For more information, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Comments
0 comments on “Atlanta hospital patients' outsourced data made public ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
