NIH blocks public access to DNA database to protect privacy
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, September 15, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
National Institute of Health (NIH) officials have removed two databases containing patient DNA information from its public Web site after a recent study proved DNA to be personally identifiable even in small quantities, the Los Angeles Times reported August 29.
A study published in a Public Library of Science journal found that using a new type of forensic DNA analysis makes it possible to identify tiny quantities of DNA, according to the newspaper. Because genetic data could be used to confirm the identity of participants in medical research studies, NIH removed the genetic information of more than 60,000 patients from its Web site to protect patients’ privacy.
"It's possible, but the likelihood is quite low" that patients’ privacy may have been violated prior to the removal of the data from the NIH Web site, Elizabeth Nabel, MD, head of the NIH genetic studies oversight body, told the Los Angeles Times. "We wanted to err on the side of caution."
For more information, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Comments
0 comments on “NIH blocks public access to DNA database to protect privacy ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
