California legislation aims to safeguard patient information
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, September 8, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
The California Senate has approved a plan to protect patient privacy with new oversight and greater penalties, the Los Angeles Times reported August 27.
This legislation comes in the wake of major privacy breaches at UCLA Medical Center where approximately 127 employees inappropriately accessed celebrities’ medical records, according to the article.
The proposed measure provides for creation of a new state Office of Health Information Integrity with authority to assess fines of up to $250,000 against individuals who violate patient privacy, the newspaper reported.
The state Senate passed the bill by a vote of 29 to 7. Senator Roy Ashburn (R-Bakersfield) voiced support for patient privacy but voted against the legislation because of his concern that hospitals would pass the cost of a $250,000 fine on to patients.
“Our current system of protecting patient privacy has not served as a sufficient deterrent to stop repeated and damaging breaches of patient confidentiality,” Senator Elaine Alquist (D-Santa Clara), author of a companion bill that would allow fines of up to $250,000 against providers, told the newspaper.
For more information, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Comments
0 comments on “California legislation aims to safeguard patient information ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
