Q&A: Rebill rejected claims containing HCPCS code A4641 in order to receive proper payment
APCs Weekly Monitor, May 2, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
QUESTION: We have had claims rejected for nuclear medicine procedures when we report both a procedure and a radiopharmaceutical. The procedure is diagnostic (78195—lymphatics and lymph node imaging) and we report the radiopharmaceutical using with HCPCS code A4641 (radiopharmaceutical, diagnostic, not otherwise classified). Code A4641 appears in the published list of acceptable HCPCS codes for the procedure-to-radiopharmaceutical edits. Do you know what is causing these claims to reject?
ANSWER: CMS issued Transmittal 1301 (CR5665), “Revised Information for PET scan coding” which removed HCPCS code A4641 from the list of tracer codes that are applicable for positron emission tomography (PET) scans. The change was effective on January 1, 2008.
When CMS implemented this change, HCPCS code A4641 was listed as a deleted code in the edits, rather than not reportable with a PET scan CPT code. CMS rejected claims when facilities reported code A4641, even in cases where the procedure billed was not a PET scan. CMS corrected the edit in the April 2008 update to the OPPS. If this problem was occurring in your facility, you should rebill the claims in order to receive payment.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Comments
0 comments on “Q&A: Rebill rejected claims containing HCPCS code A4641 in order to receive proper payment ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
