Topic: Consider front-end speech recognition to reduce transcription turnaround time, improve documentation quality
HIM Connection, January 29, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
As hospitals begin the arduous transition to electronic health records (EHR), many are striving to find ways to make the process more manageable and less intimidating. For some, the solution has been speech recognition-a process that converts dictation directly into a text-driven electronic medium that is easily transferred to an EHR.
Front-end speech recognition immediately converts speech into text directly on the dictator's computer screen, providing real-time authentication and documentation completion, whereas back-end recognition allows a dictator to provide speech that is converted to text that is sent to an editor (other than the dictator) for corrections.
Deciding between front-end and back-end speech recognition is ultimately an individual hospital's decision, says Peter Durlach, senior vice president of marketing and product strategy for Dictaphone Healthcare Solutions, a division of Nuance Communications in Burlington, MA. "It's up to the customer to decide. It depends on what the pressures are in the specific institution that they're in," he says.
For example, one hospital may want to reduce transcription costs and complete discharge charts in a timely manner, whereas another hospital's goal is to reduce transcription turnaround time or provide more detailed documentation.
Durlach says that front-end recognition works particularly well in areas in which the turnaround time is crucial and there is a high volume of physicians who provide services for others. "The classic cases are radiology and pathology-the diagnostic areas where the physicians provide a service to others physicians, and their product is basically the result of a test or imaging study," says Durlach. Front-end works well because the ordering physician can read the test or study soon after it is conducted, he says.
Front-end also works well in areas in which a hospital may be deploying an EHR. In these cases, front-end speech recognition has been shown to significantly decrease the time required for documentation, increase the quality of the documentation, and improve physician adoption of the EHR system by eliminating data entry via the keyboard.
Editor's note: This topic is adapted from a February 2008 article in Medical Records Briefing. For more information, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “Topic: Consider front-end speech recognition to reduce transcription turnaround time, improve documentation quality ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched