Tip of the Week: Differentiate between STVX packaged and T-packaged services
APCs Weekly Monitor, January 25, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
It's important to understand that there are two types of services that have a status indicator of Q:
- STVX packaged services
- T-packaged services
STVX packaged services refer to three specific HCPCS codes: 75898, 76000, and 0126T. If a coder reports a CPT or HCPCS code with a status indicator of Q on the same date of service as one of these three STVX codes, CMS will not generate a separate APC payment. But if the coder reports a status indicator Q service by itself or with other CPT/HCPCS code(s) without a status indicator of STVX, then CMS will generate payment.
Status indicator Q services are T-packaged services. There are 93 T-packaged services codes that CMS processes using a similar logic to the one it uses to process STVX packaged services. If a coder reports a line item with a status indicator Q on the same date of service as a T-packaged code, the Outpatient Code Editor will not generate a separate APC payment for the service with the status indicator Q. If the coder reports a status indicator Q line item on a date of service without a status T procedure, then it will generate separate reimbursement.
This is how services with status indicator Q are fundamentally different from those that are newly designated as unconditionally packaged with status indicator N. Status indicator Q services may generate separate payment under certain circumstances, whereas status indicator N services never will.
(The above tip was excerpted from the January issue of Briefings on APCs).
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Comments
0 comments on “Tip of the Week: Differentiate between STVX packaged and T-packaged services ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched