Tip: Query when treatment/monitoring of patient supports the question
CDI Strategies, January 24, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Clinical documentation improvement (CDI) specialists shouldn't be afraid to query, says Heather Taillon, RHIA, manager of coding compliance at St. Francis Hospital in Beech Grove, IN. After all, in the 2008 Inpatient Prospective Payment System final rule CMS stated the following:
We highly encourage physicians and hospitals to work together to use the most specific codes that describe their patient's conditions. Such an effort will not only result in more accurate payment by Medicare, but will provide better information on the incidence of this disease in the Medicare patient population.
But CDI specialists need to query compliantly. For example, they should query on concurrent review of documentation for clinical "results/picture" that are not documented in the chart. Also, they should look to determine whether the clinical picture and treatment/monitoring of the patient supports the question they are asking, Taillon notes. Following is a clinical example that demonstrates this point:
A patient has a hemogloblin of 12 g/dl on admission prior to surgery. Postoperatively, the patient's hemoglobin drops to 8 g/dl, and the physician does not document postoperative blood loss anemia in the chart. If the physician provides no further treatment, do not query in this case. "Even though you have a clinical picture, no treatment was provided," Taillon says.
However, if in the same example, the physician orders a transfusion or reassesses the surgical site with further testing, a query is warranted.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Comments
0 comments on “Tip: Query when treatment/monitoring of patient supports the question ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched