HHS advisory committee calls for stronger health data privacy
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, January 14, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
The National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS) recently released a report, "Enhanced Protections for Uses of Health Data: A Stewardship Framework for 'Secondary Uses' of Electronically Collected and Transmitted Health Data," which made more than 20 specific recommendations for increasing the privacy of EHRs, according to a January 7 article in The National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS) recently released a report, "Enhanced Protections for Uses of Health Data: A Stewardship Framework for 'Secondary Uses' of Electronically Collected and Transmitted Health Data," which made more than 20 specific recommendations for increasing the privacy of EHRs, according to a January 7 article in Government Health IT. In the report, NCVHS calls for "a transformation, in which the focus is on appropriate data stewardship for all uses of health data by all users, independent of whether an organization is covered under HIPAA."
The committee also found that HIPAA is effective when health data is used for patient care, but that "the more removed the user is from the patient, the less assurance there is that the data will be protected," says the article. "[The report] raised concerns about the sale of health data, the adequacy of de-identification techniques, the numerous state and federal laws covering health information privacy, and the difficulty of distinguishing between research using health data and quality improvement programs using the same data," according to the article.
For more information, click here.
To read the report, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Comments
0 comments on “HHS advisory committee calls for stronger health data privacy ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched