Ask the expert: It is my understanding that atherosclerosis of bypass grafts is considered a complication/comorbidity (CC). What about vessels that have stents or a stented vessel that restenosed?
HIM Connection, January 15, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
A: It depends on whether the restenosis is due to the progression of the disease or whether the presence of the stent is causing scar tissue to form around the stent site. Coding Clinic, third quarter 2006, discusses how to code restenosis due to a progression of the disease. This is the most common of the two scenarios.
Note that code 414.01 is not a CC or a major CC (MCC) condition.
When the stenosis is due to the presence of the stent, Coding Clinic instructs us to report code 996.74, which is a CC. Given that physicians typically use drug-coated stents, the percentage of patients with the true complications due to the stent insertion is most likely lower. More often, the progression of the disease causes the restenosis.
Refer to the following Coding Clinic references:
- Coding Clinic, Vol. 23, No. 3, third quarter 2006
- Coding Clinic, Vol. 17, No. 1, first quarter 2000
Editor's note: Shannon McCall, RHIA, CCS, CPC, director of coding and HIM for HCPro, Inc., in Chesterfield, VA, answered this question.
This Q&A was adapted from the January 2008 issue of Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies. For more information, visit www.hcpro.com/content/202988.cfm.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “Ask the expert: It is my understanding that atherosclerosis of bypass grafts is considered a complication/comorbidity (CC). What about vessels that have stents or a stented vessel that restenosed? ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched