Tip: Connect your coding, clinical documentation improvement staffs by establishing clear roles
CDI Strategies, December 13, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
One of the biggest challenges in implementing a successful clinical documentation improvement (CDI) program is getting HIM/coding staff and CDI staff to work together and minimize conflicts. An effective means of accomplishing this task is to invite coding staff to the same meetings that you use to educate your CDI staff, and take some time to define clear roles for each group, suggests Marion Kruse, MBA, RN, managing consultant for Navigant Consulting in Chicago, IL.
"When you do CDI education, get the coders in the same room as CDI so that they all understand that this is a team," Kruse says.
Make coding and CDI staff aware that they are in partnership together. The clinical documentation specialists' (CDS) role is to ensure accurate and complete physician documentation in a format that allows the coder to do his or her job.
Conversely, although clinical documentation staff typically assign a working DRG, it's the coding staff who has the ultimate responsibility for correct coding. "CDS' assign a DRG--they do not code--and there is a big difference," Kruse says. "Coding is a profession, you go to school; it's an art and it takes time to become an expert. Clinical documentation programs are not designed to turn CDS' into coders."
When a DRG conflict arises between coding and CDI, talk through the difference to find out why. Kruse says that coding staff occasionally can make mistakes or have a bad day, and other times CDI staff assign incorrect DRGs because they do not fully understand coding conventions.
"Either way, the CDS staff must understand that coders have the ultimate responsibility for the coding of the chart, and must defer to the coders' judgment and expertise," Kruse says. "CDS staff must approach these differences of opinion with an attitude of deference and work with the coders to determine what documentation is needed to assure the clinical and coding picture match."
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched