Tip of the Week: Know when to report CPT code 45383 versus 45384
APCs Weekly Monitor, December 7, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
If you're removing a polyp, and you report CPT code 45383, ensure that the physician documented that he or she ablated or destroyed the lesion. This is the documentation that drives code selection. The January 2004 CPT Assistant discusses this code briefly. The reference indicates that you should report this code when a physician destroys a polyp using almost any method other than those that other mechanisms identify and that different codes represent.
Paraphrased instruction from CPT Assistant states that the definition of code 45383 can be misleading because the definition only states what techniques physicians should not use (e.g., biopsy forceps [code 45384], bipolar cautery [code 45384], and snare [code 45385]). Physicians should not use these techniques because it might not be possible to actually remove the lesion. The physician can perform the ablation of the tissue (e.g., tumor, polyp, or other lesion) with many different types of devices (e.g., heater probe, bipolar cautery probe, argon laser, etc.) regardless of whether the physician obtains a sample with biopsy forceps before the he or she applies the ablative device.
A paraphrased instruction from CPT Assistant also states that technique drives code selection. Therefore,you would code the hot biopsy using CPT code 45384. For the ablation/destruction by methods other than hot biopsy, snare, or cold biopsy technique, report code 45383.
(The above tip was excerpted from the December issue of Briefings on APCs).
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched