The Weekly Roundup
Homecare E-News, August 31, 2015
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login.
The National Association for Home Care and Hospice (NAHC) released a draft Friday of its comments on two key provisions of the proposed home health PPS rule for calendar year 2016. The trade association’s recommendations include withdrawing the steep case mix weight adjustments proposed for the next two years and reducing the percentage of payment at stake in the value based purchasing (VBP) program planned for the setting.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login.
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Joint Commission’s top-cited standards list gives hospitals plenty to work on
- Don’t forget the three checks in medication administration
- Focusing on OR fire prevention
- Differentiate between types of wound debridement
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Complications from immobility by body system
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- What is the difference between an IPA and a medical group?
- Know guidelines and subtle differences in code descriptions for laceration repairs
- E-mailed
-
- Focusing on OR fire prevention
- Joint Commission’s top-cited standards list gives hospitals plenty to work on
- CMS shifts from denials to RTPs for home health claims with no matching OASIS
- Program coordinator importance
- Reimbursement for Facility and Professional Services in a Provider-Based Department by Gina M. Reese, Esq., RN
- Q&A: Reporting stent placement with other procedures
- Q&A: Postop pain/nausea medication, antibiotics generally not separately billable
- Q&A: Identifying the principal diagnosis beyond DRG capture
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Injections and infusions continue to confuse coders
- Searched