CMS clears up common misconceptions about the transition to ICD-10
Homecare E-News, May 4, 2015
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login.
CMS recently spoke with the provider community to help dispel some of the myths surrounding ICD-10. Through these conversations, the agency identified some prevalent misperceptions about the looming transition to the new coding system and published clarifying facts in response.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login.
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- CMS seeks comment on quality measures
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Differentiate between types of wound debridement
- Don’t forget the three checks in medication administration
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- ICD-10-CM coma, stroke codes require more specific documentation
- What to include on the incident report
- Complications from immobility by body system
- Know guidelines and subtle differences in code descriptions for laceration repairs
- E-mailed
-
- Joint Commission deletes more than 130 requirements, including medical record requirements
- How to assign the correct ED E/M code
- HFAP revises ligature risks standards
- Healthcare organizations are addressing second-victim syndrome, but more must be done
- Dig into the details of wound care documentation
- Coding Clinic caveats
- CMS concerned AOs missing fire and smoke barrier, sprinkler deficiencies
- CMS clarifies Method II CAH billing for anesthesiologist services
- Case Study: Human Trafficking Prevention at Dignity Health
- Can we bill for triage and admit for a patient who left before being seen?
- Searched