Minnesota court rules hospitals can be sued for negligent credentialing
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, October 11, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that hospitals can be sued for negligent credentialing, making it the 26th state to recognize such claims, according to the October 15 edition of American Medical News. The ruling does not override existing peer review confidentiality laws, but it does allow plaintiffs to use outside information (i.e. evidence from prior lawsuits) to build a case.
Opponents of this decision claim that it will make physicians reluctant to get involved with peer review, and that it will provide more obstacles for practitioners seeking privileges. However, supporters argue that it only reinforces a hospital's obligation to ensuring patient safety.
The original case which sparked this most recent litigation was filed by Mary Larson who claimed her gastric bypass surgeon, Dr. James P. Wasemiller was unqualified to treat her, and negligently credentialed to do so by St. Francis Medical Center. After the surgery, Larson discovered that Wasemiller had failed his surgical board exams three times, and was a defendant in several other lawsuits, according to the article.
To read the entire American Medical News article, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
