Tip of the week: Audits should be proactive rather than reactive
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, August 2, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Rather than taking a reactionary approach to medical staff office issues that arise, healthcare organizations should be proactive and consider performing audits on issues that they deem important or problematic. For MSPs, the credentialing and privileging processes are a great place to start.
A logical first step in determining what information to audit is for the director of medical staff services or the director of credentialing to contact members of the credentialing committee, the hospital CEO or chief operating officer, and others with ties to the medical staff office to ask what information about the credentialing and privileging processes they would like to receive on a regular basis.
Alternatively, the director of medical staff services could also provide an inventory of the types of audits that could be conducted to give those groups and individuals an idea of the possibilities.
This week's tip is from Credentialing audits: Tools for compliance and reduced liability, by Vicki L. Searcy, CPMSM. For more information, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
