Benefits of using a credentialing verification organization
Credentialing & Verification Update, July 18, 2007
Hospitals have a number of opportunities to involve a credentialing verification organization (CVO) in their credentialing activities. Such activities may include distributing and receiving applications, conducting primary source verification, collecting letters of reference, querying the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) as an agent of the hospital, and verifying clinical experience.
Although a CVO might be more efficient because it devotes its time exclusively to primary source verification, the CVO's true benefit lies in minimizing the bureaucracy for physicians who might otherwise be required to complete a separate application for each organization at which they seek medical staff membership and/or clinical privileges.
For example, a physician who seeks privileges in three managed care organizations (MCOs), four hospitals, a nursing home, a surgicenter, and an independent practice association may currently need to complete 10 applications-one application for each entity. But if the physician goes through a CVO, he or she needs to fill out only one application, saving both the physician and anyone involved in processing his or her application valuable time.
Every hospital that uses a CVO should note that even though it might delegate a part of its credentialing to the CVO, the hospital still bears the ultimate responsibility for the entire credentialing process and its outcome. Therefore, a hospital should monitor a CVO's activities to ensure that it follows all policies and procedures. Your hospital might want to check whether the organization meets the National Committee on Quality Assurance's (NCQA's) accreditation requirements for CVOs; accreditation usually indicates a quality credentials verification system.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched
