The pros and cons of various primary source verification methods
Credentialing & Verification Update, June 6, 2007
Medical staff professionals (MSPs) use various modes of communication-including telephone, fax, mail, the Internet, and e-mail-to obtain necessary primary source verifications for applicants. Because some modes are more advantageous than others in certain circumstances, MSPs should remember to use all resources at their disposal.
Below, we outline advantages and disadvantages of each common mode of verification. The mode(s) your hospital chooses will depend on its facilities and any rules, regulations, and laws regarding the information requested.
- Telephone
Pros: It's quick, easy, and often free of charge
Cons: It provides no written evidence of verification (a contemporaneous note is recommended); some offices are difficult to reach (phone's always busy, hours are incompatible with your MSO, etc.)
- Mail/written
Pros: It provides written evidence of verification
Cons: Mail can be slow and cause a longer turnaround time; stamps and paper can be costly; it is time consuming to write a letter for each request (or group of requests); many offices charge for written verifications, especially those that have official seals embossed or printed
- Internet/Web
Pros: It's quick, easy, and often free of charge
Cons: Some sites are not guaranteed to contain current information and thus may be unreliable; some MSOs do not have Internet access and/or the equipment required for online access
- E-mail
Pros: Information is accurate and current; it's quick, easy, and often inexpensive or free of charge
Cons: Some MSOs do not have access to e-mail
Editor's note: Many MSOs still rely on time-consuming Web searches or calls to hospitals' main switchboards to locate the office that can primary source verify practitioners' data. Meanwhile, subscribers to CPDR simply log on to the CPDR Web site daily to directly reach more than 1,000 hospital medical staff credentialing offices, over 500 nursing schools, roughly 300 medical schools, and more. We continue to add more listings every quarter. If you aren't a CPDR subscriber, please accept my invitation to sign up for a free 30-day trial. Click here.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched
