The nuts and bolts of querying the National Practitioner Data Bank
Credentialing & Verification Update, May 23, 2007
The nature of National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) report-triggering events varies depending on the type of reporting organization. According to the NPDB Guidebook, hospitals must report "professional review action, based on reasons related to professional competence or conduct, adversely affecting clinical privileges for a period longer than 30 days; or voluntary surrender or restriction of clinical privileges while under, or to avoid, investigation."
The NPDB Guidebook defines a professional review action as "an activity of a healthcare entity with respect to an individual physician, dentist, or other healthcare practitioner: (1) to determine whether the physician, dentist, or other healthcare practitioner may have clinical privileges with respect to, or membership in, the entity; (2) to determine the scope or conditions of such privileges or membership; or (3) to change or modify such privileges or membership."
Before querying the NPDB, hospitals and other eligible organizations must first register to receive information and authorization. This can be accomplished via the Web site (www.npdb-hipdb.hrsa.gov/register.html). Failure to register does not excuse an organization from the required querying and reporting obligations.
To query the NPDB, entities must use the IQRS, an electronic, Web-based system for querying and reporting. The NPDB does not accept written requests for information from hospitals and other heathcare entities. Currently, the cost of an electronic query and response is $4.75 per name, which must be paid by credit card or electronic funds transfer. Practitioners who wish to self-query may do so online for an $8.00 fee.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
