A renewed focus on hospital bylaws
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, May 3, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
The relationship between physicians and the hospitals they work in is constantly changing and, in some cases, has become competitive as both entities vie for the same healthcare dollars. Add to that the need to keep up with evolving Joint Commission standards, and the importance of having comprehensive, up-to-date bylaws is clear.
"Any hospital that has not had its medical staff bylaws updated in the last five years should do it, because the issues change so frequently they could get in trouble," Dan Mulholland, a partner in Horty Springer & Mattern, a healthcare law firm in Pittsburgh, tells HealthLeaders Magazine in the April edition.
Healthcare organizations must revise their medical staff bylaws to reflect the latest Joint Commission standards, but should also write bylaws in a way that allows both hospitals and physicians to operate successfully, HealthLeaders reports. "If there is language in them that can hamstring a hospital's ability to fulfill its mission, that can really tie a hospital up," Mulholland says.
He cites two examples:
- If a hospital wishes to enter into an exclusive relationship with, for example, a radiology group, other radiologists on the medical staff may look to the bylaws to prohibit the move.
- If the bylaws outline a lengthy due process mechanism for physicians accused of providing poor patient care, the hospital and other members of the medical staff can be embroiled in what Mulholland calls a "nightmarish Dickensian ordeal," courtesy of the bylaws.
To read the entire article, "Building Better Bylaws," click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
