Checking applications during reappointment
Credentialing & Verification Update, April 25, 2007
Requiring applicants to complete applications for reappointment is a crucial step in satisfying the hospital's legal burden to ensure practitioner competence. Though the reappointment process is similar to the process for initial appointment in that each requires gathering and verifying credentials information, the reappointment process generally looks at the practitioner's capability based on his or her clinical performance, insurance history, and ability to work with hospital colleagues.
The checklist that follows contains some-but not all-matters that hospitals are typically expected to inquire about during reappointment.
- Patterns of care and membership status at all hospitals where the practitioner holds medical staff privileges
- Proper completion of medical records
- On-call duty response rate
- Continuing medical education
- Complete medical staff rounds
- Compliance with medical staff bylaws and hospital policies, rules, regulations, and procedures
- Number of procedures performed, circumstances surrounding those procedures, and their outcomes
- The practitioner's interpersonal relationships with other staff members, especially with nurses and support staff
- Malpractice insurance and claims history
- Drug utilization reports from the hospital pharmacy and the medical records department
- Patient/staff complaints and risk management reports
- NPDB information
- Information from the Office of Inspector General's list of excluded individuals and entities
- Licensure status
- Health status
In the next issue of CVU: three key steps to verification during reappointment.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
