Q&A: Does The Joint Commission require individual practitioners to have malpractice insurance?
Credentialing & Verification Update, March 14, 2007
A: The Joint Commission does not require that a practitioner hold malpractice coverage, but rather leaves it up to each institution to decide whether malpractice coverage is mandatory, and, if so, in what amount and what type.
If coverage is required by the organization's medical staff bylaws, policies, or rules and regulations, then verification of coverage must be obtained.
Editor's note: Questions and topic suggestions can be e-mailed to Credentialing & Verification Update at mcoler@hcpro.com.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
