Working with the 'what ifs'
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, February 15, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
When I work with medical staff leaders to create privileging criteria, there are a number of specific questions often raised that deal with what I call the "what ifs."
What if:
- We would like to offer a position to a very well-trained and qualified physician who is not certified by the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) or the American Osteopathic Association (AOA)? Instead he/she is certified by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons in
- An initial applicant has been on a leave of absence and does not meet the defined volume criteria for requesting the core privileges in his/her specialty?
- At reappointment the practitioner requesting a particular privilege doesn't meet the defined volume criteria for that particular privilege?
One of the guiding principles of credentialing is that excellent credentialing requires clear criteria consistently applied. With this principle as a guide, it is important to remember that criteria are not created for the exception. hen an exception to the rule occurs, there needs to be a method to manage that exception appropriately.
Each one of the above scenarios can be managed appropriately in a variety of ways. However, the point for our purposes here is that in order to have the ability to manage the exceptions, it is important to have waiver language within your medical staff bylaws that allows the governing board to make exceptions based upon recommendations from the medical executive committee (MEC).
An example of such language might be:
Only the board may create exceptions to the qualifications for membership and/or privileges after consultation with the MEC.
Remember, credentialing has no other master than the patient.
That's all for this week.
All the best,
Sally J. Pelletier, CPMSM, CPCS
Sally J. Pelletier, CPMSM, CPCS, is a consultant with The Greeley Company, a division of HCPro, Inc. specializing in the areas of credentialing and privileging.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
