Ongoing professional practice evaluations
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, November 2, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
With the introduction of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) requirement for ongoing professional practice evaluation (OPPE) in 2007, it is no longer sufficient to gather and evaluate performance improvement data on practitioners for use solely at reappointment and when re-granting privileges. Even though many hospitals have moved away from an intermittent evaluation process and towards, instead, a continuous approach, many have not. Time is running out for those who have not yet designed and implemented a continuous process for analyzing physicians' competency to move towards this goal on their own. Both the JCAHO's continuous survey readiness process and the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) maintenance of certification programs[1] are examples of this trend towards ongoing monitoring OPPE will become effective on Instead of a credentialing and privileging process that gathers subjective information for use at initial appointment and reappointment, OPPE pushes the industry towards a more objective and evidence based privileging process. More than likely you already have a variety of departments collecting individual data on physicians in your facility. However, education will be needed for: - Medical service professionals and medical staff leaders regarding where to obtain the data (such as the appropriate departments) - Those who possess the data (quality and clinical departments, for example) to explain why it is needed by the medical staff office and how to present it in a format that is effective for use in making credentialing and privileging decisions The expectation is that hospitals use data to evaluate practitioners and, if necessary, intervene if there are issues that impact the provision of safe patient care. If there is insufficient data upon which to make a decision regarding privileges, additional appropriate steps should be taken to determine if the practitioner is eligible, or to proctor for a period of time. In summary, hospitals need make sure that data and information are gathered and used as the basis for the decision to continue, limit, or revoke practitioner specific clinical privileges.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched
