AHA weighs on MS.1.20
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, October 26, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
While expressing support for recent revisions to the much-discussed changes to the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) standard MS.1.20, the American Hospital Association (AHA), pushed for an additional change, allowing hospitals two to three years to be in compliance.
Hospitals and medical staffs have commented that previous proposed revisions to the standard were overly prescriptive and burdensome. MS.1.20 has undergone multiple field reviews and revisions based on feedback from the field.
The proposed EP 27, which would require hospitals to have a provision to allow the medical staff to propose medical staff bylaws and amendments to the hospital's governing body, as currently worded "suggests that the governing body's approval of medical staff bylaws and amendments that originate with the organized medical staff is inevitable or nothing more than a formality," according to the AHA's letter to the JCAHO on Oct. 23.
The AHA suggested wording that "conveys a necessarily more precise meaning that EP 27 is to be implemented consistent with the ultimate decision-making authority of a hospital's governing body."
Citing hospital reports that it takes a minimum of two years to adopt bylaws amendments, the AHA recommended that the JCAHO permit hospitals to amend their medical staff bylaws during the hospital's next regular updating cycle, and establish an "outer time limit" of three years from the adoption of MS.1.20 to come into compliance.
The National Association Medical Staff Services (NAMSS) is urging the JCAHO to discontinue its revisions to Standard MS.1.20, or to clarify in the introduction to the standards that adoption of the proposed revisions to MS.1.20 is voluntary.
The JCAHO will close a third field review of MS.1.20 on October 27.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched
