Should medical device manufacturers' representatives be "credentialed?"
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, September 21, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
It is common for the representatives of medical device or system manufacturers to be present in the operating room (OR), endoscopy suite, catheter lab, or other rooms in which special procedures are being performed. Typically, they are there to train practitioners and provide general advice on how to use a piece of equipment or device, sell a new device or technology, or instruct physicians on how to perform a new procedure.
Until just a few years ago, these individuals may have been allowed to simply show up and begin assisting the surgical team. However, due to heightened focus on patient safety initiatives, hospitals, ORs, medical staff leaders, and credentialing specialists are increasingly aware of the need to credential all individuals who work in the hospital setting.
The first time that a facility has a discussion about how medical device company representatives are to be handled and whether they are to be allowed into the OR should happen before one of these individuals appears at the hospital. Policy established and developed by the surgical department should provide guidance and structure for the requirements and procedure by which these individuals will be allowed to provide assistance to the surgical team.
The American
Qualifications established by the hospital for monitoring medical device representatives should include verification of education and training, liability coverage, government-issued photo identification, and letters of reference.
Note: The CRC's Clinical Privilege White Papers also addressed this topic in "Special Report 1010 - Healthcare industry representatives in the operating room," published in January 2005.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Q/A: Correct use of modifier -PT
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- "Wall fountains" may be spreading Legionnaires to patients, visitors
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Case Management Monthly, March 2012
- Searched
