Leaves of absence and physician reappointments
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, August 31, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Recently, a reader asked whether the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) allows any exceptions for practitioners returning from leaves of absence for active military duty. Specifically, when their reappointments are due to expire or have expired, do these practitioners have to start the application process from scratch upon return from active service?
The JCAHO does not distinguish between leaves of absence for military, personal, or medical reasons. Further, the Joint Commission does not allow for extensions or for practitioners to practice beyond their two-year reappointment date.
Your medical staff bylaws should outline the process for requesting a leave of absence. This bylaw can delineate special conditions for practitioners requesting leave when they are called to active military duty. In addition, the bylaws should include requirements for requesting reinstatement of membership and privileges, allowing time for the facility to verify clinical activity.
Consider the following options for handling the reappointment of a practitioner who takes a leave of absence:
· Process the practitioner's reappointment before the leave is in effect, even if this date occurs before his or her reappointment date
· Allow the reappointment to lapse and fully re-credential the practitioner upon his or her return
· Process the practitioners' reappointment during his or her leave
Under all of these circumstances, you must verify the practitioner's current competence and ability to perform the privileges requested prior to allowing him or her to practice at your institution.
The practitioner should provide both a summary of professional activities undertaken during the leave of absence and any additional information requested by the hospital. Verification of this information by the facility should be consistent with credentialing and privileging policies and procedures.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
