New Medical Staff Requirement Delayed until 2007
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, May 25, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) announced that the implementation of the new requirement for Medical Staff standard MS.1.20 has been delayed until January 2007.
The JCAHO closed a field review of MS 1.20 in early March 2006 addressing what information must be included in hospital bylaws versus that which may be included in supplemental documents, such as manuals and policies. The standard is expected to undergo a second field review in late summer, to address hospital concerns about requiring extensive review of existing medical staff bylaws and other documents.
The Standards and Survey Procedures Committee will provide additional input for the field review at its July 17 meeting, and a possible implementation date will be determined at that time, the National Association of Medical Staff Services (NAMSS) reports on its web site, (http://www.namss.org/).
Under the standard, the new Element of Performance (EP 19) would require that the medical staff and the governing body agree on the following:
§ The issues that must be addressed in the medical staff bylaws.
§ The criteria used to identify the issues that must be addressed in the medical staff bylaws.
§ The process used for joint adoption/approval of other issues that are addressed in the rules, regulations and policies.
The proposed EP evoked serious concerns from the field, which see the new requirement as prescriptive and burdensome, requiring an extensive review of existing medical staff bylaws and other documents.
The JCAHO stated on its web site (http://www.jointcommission.org/) that "delaying implementation allows further exploration and possible modifications that would address these concerns. MS.1.20 originated from the 2004 reformatting of the standards. Following confusion in the field regarding the intent of MS.1.20, EP.19 was developed."
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
