JCAHO proposes new medical staff standards, announces field review period
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, February 23, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) made available for field review revised medical staff standards addressing what information must be included in hospital bylaws versus that which may be included in supplemental documents, such as manuals and policies. The revisions, meant to clarify a set of similar revisions proposed roughly a year ago, have left many in the field more confused than before. Opportunity for comment closes March 10, 2006.
The JCAHO has issued three clarifications on standard MS.1.20 in as many years, each resulting in significant public debate. In 2005, the Joint Commission assigned a special task force to deliberate on the proposed revisions and clarify its stance on the issue.
Separately, an ad hoc advisory group whose results were reviewed by the JCAHO's Board of Commissioners Standards and Survey Procedures Committee identified two primary areas of concern:
Ambiguity regarding the meaning of the term "administrative processes."
The potential impacts for organizations that might need to open and revise their medical staff bylaws in order to comply with the revised standard.
The JCAHO seeks comments on whether the revisions were sufficiently clear, whether the revisions would necessitate significant change to organizations' existing medical staff bylaws, and, if so, whether organizations would have sufficient time to implement the changes before the revisions go into effect January 1, 2007.
"The revisions certainly suggest that a great many medical staffs that have chosen to write flexible, user-friendly governance documents will have to undertake a major rewrite effort," said Todd Sagin, MD, JD, vice president and national medical director of The Greeley Company, a division of HCPro, Inc.
Editor's note: For more information about the JCAHO's latest revisions to standard MS.1.20, visit the JCAHO's Web site at: www.jcaho.org/accredited+organizations/hospitals/standards/field+reviews/ms120_std_fr.htm.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
