ABMS phases-out two primary source tools
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, March 17, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
The American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) recently posted a "credentialing advisory notice" on its Web site (www.abms.org), stating that two of its products can no longer be used for primary source verification for credentialing purposes. Those products are: the ABMS Medical Specialists PLUS CD-ROM, and the Official ABMS Directory of Certified Medical Specialists, 37th edition and subsequent editions, both published by Elsevier Inc. in cooperation with ABMS.
According to the ABMS advisory, the change in verification status was made because information in these resources is not updated frequently, and the complete physician date of birth-an important element for credentialing verification-has been removed from the directory.
Although these tools can continue to be used as a reference resource, they should not be used to verify physician credentials for accreditation purposes, the ABMS says.
As of January 2005, the only acceptable ABMS verification sources are products or services specifically designated by the ABMS as an Official ABMS Display Agent or those directly from the ABMS and its member boards (but not an agent or licensee) where a dated certificate of primary source authenticity has been provided.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
