AMA testifies on liability reform
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, February 24, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
The American Medical Association (AMA) testified on February 17 before the U.S. House Committee on Small Business to stress the urgent need for reform in the nation's medical liability system, which is currently threatening patient access to health care.
"Common-sense medical liability reforms work," said former AMA president Donald J. Palmisano, MD, in testimony. "Polls show that about 73 percent of Americans support medical liability reforms that include a cap on non-economic damages; the subjective award for pain and suffering."
Medical liability reform is currently at the top of the AMA's legislative priority list. Currently, 20 states are experiencing full-blown medical liability crisis, and 24 states are facing a potential crisis. The AMA reform proposal includes a $250,000 cap on non-economic (pain and suffering) damages, with an unlimited allowance for economic damages such as medical expenses, rehabilitation costs and lost wages.
The AMA reform model is based on California's successful system, which has maintained patient access to care and stabilized medical liability insurance premiums for 30 years. Today, because of the nation's hyperactive lawsuit culture, the average ob-gyn is sued two to three times a year and 50 percent of neurosurgeons are sued every year.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
