JCAHO liability reform urges strengthening of competency oversight
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, February 10, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) recently called for reform in the nation's medical liability system, urging that current proposals for non-economic damages caps be expanded to pursue intermediate and long-term system changes that truly assist the improvement of patient safety. The reform proposal is laid out in the JCAHO's newest public policy white paper, "Health Care at the Crossroads: Strategies for Improving the Medical Liability System and Preventing Patient Injury."
The report urges intensified attention to patient safety and medical injury prevention by health care providers and practitioners; emphasizes the critical importance of open communication between patients and practitioners; and urges the creation of an injury compensation system that is patient-centered and serves the common good. Specific recommendations address the need to encourage the creation of cultures of safety in health care organizations as well as strengthening oversight and accountability mechanisms for ensuring the competency of doctors and nurses.
Any redesign of the medical liability system, the report suggests, should assure appropriate compensation for all injured patients, while also encouraging health care providers and practitioners to surface errors, learn from mistakes in the design and performance of care processes, and take action to ensure that adverse events do not recur.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
