Massachusetts panel makes recommendations for weight-loss surgery
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, August 25, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Last year, in the wake of several patient deaths, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health called for an expert panel to study weight-loss surgery programs and patient safety. Earlier this month, the panel recommended that hospitals and physicians adopt strict standards -- including tough privileging standards for surgeons -- to reduce patient deaths and complications.
Based on their review of medical studies, the panel said hospitals that do more than 100 surgeries a year and surgeons who do 50 to 100 cases a year, have lower complication rates.
According to the panel, the risk of medical errors and complications are most likely to be minimized under the following conditions:
- Rigorous training that puts a strong emphasis on patient safety and includes close monitoring and early supervision of surgeons in their learning curves
- Ongoing training and accumulation of experience that takes place in a supportive setting, with extended proctoring by experienced weight-loss surgeons
- High volume surgeons (with 50-100 cases per year) operating in properly equipped, high-volume weight loss centers (more than 100 cases per year) with integrated and multidisciplinary treatment
The 70-page report includes guidelines for many aspects of bariatric surgery. Go to http://www.mass.gov/dph/, to read the full report.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
