Why you need a privileging policy to address new technology
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, August 4, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Dear credentialing colleague:
The delineation of clinical privileges continues to be one of the most complex issues facing today's medical staff. As privileging issues have expanded into the areas of ambulatory care, crossover privileges, privileging for new technology, and privileging in exclusive contractual service areas, the need for a consistent privileging policy is obvious.
In many cases, privileging questions arise and the medical staff has no policy or privileging criteria to follow. These questions can arise under the following circumtances:
- a physician requests a new privilege
- a physician wants to use a new piece of technology
- the operating room scheduler notices something new on the schedule
- the operating staff is requested to set up differently than in the past
- a medical staff professional or department chair brings the issue to your attention
- you read in the local paper that your hospital was the first in the state to introduce this new patient care technique
Current medical staff bylaws rarely provide the guidelines necessary to ensure that privileging is done in an objective, reasonable manner. Therefore, it is suggested that a hospital's medical executive committee, credentials committee, and department chairs agree on and recommend to the board the process through which privileges will be requested, accepted for review, considered, and recommended to the board.
That's it for today.
All the best,
Hugh Greeley
www.greeley.com/seminars/
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
