JCAHO seeks comment on expanding primary source verification
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, August 4, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
The JCAHO is seeking comment from healthcare organizations on a proposed change to its standards that would require primary-source verification for all practitioners required to have a license to practice.
The JCAHO has put out for "field review" a proposed change to standard HR.1.20 that would require verification of licensure, certification, or registration from primary sources, not only for all licensed independent practitioners as the accreditor now requires, but for advance practice nurses, physicians assistants and other staff who must have a license to practice. HR. 1.20 is found in the Human Resources chapter of the Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals. Comments are due by Friday, August 20.
The JCAHO noted the growing number of practitioners now licensed in order to practice. "Because of the ease of producing fraudulent credentials, the procedure of merely viewing the license or receiving a copy of the individual's license simply do not provide adequate protection against the against the use of fraudulent credentials," JCAHO president Dennis O'Leary, MD, wrote in a letter to organizations. Along with hospitals, the change would also apply to ambulatory care, behavioral health care, home care, crucial access hospitals, long-term care, and assisted living facilities.
Go to the JCAHO's Web site to view the proposed standard changes or complete an online comment form.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
