Three reasons for credentialing
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, May 5, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Dear credentialing colleagues:
The primary purpose of credentialing is patient safety. Industry expert Lee Dockerty, MD, former executive vice president of the American Board of Medical Specialties, stated that the "patient is the primary reason we engage in this activity."
For credentials committees, the first step to ensuring effective credentialing is complete information concerning all candidates for appointment and reappointment. Medical staff leaders must then carefully scrutinize that information.
- Action item: Ensure that your credentials process results in fully verified information regarding all aspects of a practitioner's prior experience.
The second purpose of credentialing is to facilitate practice by physicians and others in the hospital or healthcare system. Under federal and state laws and regulations, no practitioner may practice within a hospital without clinical privileges. The job of the credentials committee and medical executive committee is to see to it that good physicians face as few barriers to hospital practice as possible.
- Action item: Reduce unnecessary bureaucracy, trim the time between application and appointment, establish excellent rules, and create transparency in your credentialing process.
The third reason for credentialing is institutional protection, including protection from legitimate corporate negligence challenges, accreditation standards violations, community embarrassment, and Office of Inspector General fines or sanctions.
- Action item: Dot all "I's" and cross all "T's." Never assume any information is unimportant. Follow up on all red flags, and fully document all activities.
That's it for this week.
All the best,
Hugh Greeley
http://www.greeley.com/seminars/
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
