No exceptions to this rule
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, April 27, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Dear Credentialing Colleague:
Occasionally, medical staff professionals and credentialing specialists experience difficulty obtaining information about practitioners. Remember, the burden lies with the applicant to produce the necessary and requested information for an organization.
No hospital or managed care organization should appoint a practitioner or grant privileges to a practitioner until it receives, verifies, and evaluates all required information.
Your organization should develop a policy that requires that a practitioner who either applies for or maintains medical staff membership and/or privileges must provide the evidence that demonstrates, in the sole discretion of the hospital, that he or she meets the hospital's established criteria for membership and privileges. This policy would apply at the time of initial appointment, reappointment, application for clinical privileges, employment, or at any time during a practitioner's affiliation with the institution.
There are no exceptions to this rule. There may be cases when references fail to respond, or prior organizations fail to confirm affiliations, provide disciplinary information, or provide needed peer review information. Under these circumstances, the institution should send an appropriately drafted business letter to the practitioner informing him or her of the organization's policy.
The letter should also notify the practitioner that the medical staff will terminate the application process if it does not receive the required information.
For sample policies and letters that address this challenge, check out HCPro's "The Complete Medical Staff Office Manual."
That's all for this week.
All the best,
Hugh Greeley
http://www.greeley.com/seminars/
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
