New equivalent sources for credentialing physician assistants
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, March 24, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Dear Credentialing Colleague:
Congratulations to the American Medical Association (AMA). The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) announced last week its decision to designate selected data from the
Patrick McDonald, of the AMA, shared the good news with me this week. The JCAHO's decision allows medical staff services professionals (MSSPs) to use select information from the AAPA Physician Assistant Profile as equivalent primary source--making MSSPs jobs just a bit less taxing.
In a letter making it official, the JCAHO stated: "This letter awards designated equivalent status for two data elements within the [AAPA] Masterfile. These two data elements are: 1) the status of education of physician assistants in their medical school, and 2) the status of certification in the National Commission for the Certification of Physician Assistants."
"For the purpose of these two data elements, designated equivalent status means that the results of a query from the AAPA Masterfile can be used in the same way as a query of the primary source," the JCAHO wrote.
McDonald notes, however, that in regard to physician assistants' licensure, the AAPA Masterfile is still considered a credentials verification organization (CVO) source and is therefore subject to the JCAHO's 10 principles for evaluating data from an external source. (Find those principles in the rationale for JCAHO standard MS.4.10 in the medical staff chapter of the Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals.)
Once again, congratulations to the AMA for organizing a program that helps MSSPs and credentialing professionals nationwide perform this important work.
That's all for this week.
All the best,
http://www.greeley.com/seminars/
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
