Next challenge: Unannounced surveys
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, February 26, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Dear Credentialing Colleague: For hospitals ready to face the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations' (JCAHO) new tracer methodology survey process, the next big challenge is going to be unannounced surveys.
If your hospital was recently surveyed by the JCAHO, it is likely your next survey will come without warning, as the accreditor will shift to a strictly unannounced survey schedule starting in January 2006. Although you may receive slight advanced notice from the hospital across town, your survey will not be scheduled weeks in advance to allow you ample time to review the medical executive committee, performance improvement, credentialing, and other critical medical staff activities.
If you haven't been conducting ongoing drug usage review, there will be nothing you can do to mitigate the likelihood that a surveyor will find out. If your department chairs, medical staff officers, and other key physicians do not know how your performance improvement program works, it is unlikely you will be able to provide a "just in time" inservice to bring them up to speed.
If the medical staff and hospital are in the midst of a crisis such as a fair hearing, medical staff management dispute, or an investigation of last night's sentinel event, the surveyors will most likely push on with the survey and your administrative and medical staff leaders will need to "work around it."
I can picture the chief of staff, surgical department chair, credentials committee chair, and other key leaders (along with some board members) receiving a frantic early morning call from the administration asking them if they can cancel their entire day to participate in a JCAHO unannounced survey.
It's increasingly important that institutions are continuously prepared to demonstrate that they meet or surpass JCAHO standards--a practice that is better for hospitals, the JCAHO, and patients.
That's all for this week.
All the best,
Hugh Greeley
http://www.greeley.com/seminars/
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
