Re-evaluate application fees
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, October 8, 2003
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Dear Credentialing Colleague,
Today, the majority of urban or semi-urban hospitals levy an application fee against physicians applying for membership to the medical staff. These fees range from a low of $20-$30 to a high of $400. It is unclear whether such fees reap substantial benefits. After all, 50 applications per year would bring in only $10,000--not much more than the revenue associated with a few procedures in the ambulatory surgical unit.
One wonders whether the hospital's management has carefully considered the possibility that application fees might actually dissuade physicians from applying. With projections suggesting that the nation could face a shortage of up to 150,000 specialists by 2020, it might be prudent to reassess the pros and cons of application fees.
Many colleges and universities are now reconsidering application fees and substituting them with a two-part application process. Part one is an assessment of the applicant's intent and commitment, and part two involves an evaluation of academic potential. Perhaps such a mechanism might be useful within the health care industry. Medical staff application "part one" might concentrate on the physician's intended practice plan and commitment to the hospital. "Part two" would permit an evaluation of competence and qualifications.
Here are some questions to consider:
- What is the intended purpose of the application fee?
- Is the fee a significant revenue generator?
- Does the fee dissuade potential applications to the determent of the hospital?
- Does the fee offset the cost of processing the application, or does it fall short or accrue to the medical staff fund?
- Does the hospital charge fees simply because they always have in the past?
That's all for this week.
All the best,
Hugh Greeley
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched
