Take a proactive approach to 'new' privileges
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, September 18, 2003
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Dear Credentialing Colleague:
This week, I'll address the large number of questions I've received regarding privileges for bariatric surgery (a.k.a. "stomach stapling" for weight loss). Medical staff services professionals, medical staff leaders, CEOs, insurance company representatives, and even performance improvement directors have submitted queries.
As always, the first time you receive a request for bariatric surgery privileges should not be the first time you've thought about this issue. The best position a hospital can put itself in is to define in advance its stance on this procedure. It must first ask, "Will we permit the performance of baratric surgery at all?" (In other words, will the hospital offer it as a service to the community, or will it refer patients to other appropriate facilities?)
Because this kind of decision is not a credentialing issue, I'll address it no further. If, however, the answer to the first question above is "Yes, we should offer this service to the community!" it most definitely becomes a credentialing issue that requires the development of a hospital policy. Medical staff leaders must precisely define the amount of education, training, and experience necessary to carry out bariatric surgery. Augment the policy with rules that all privileged physicians must follow in order to exercise this new privilege. For example,
- agree to work as a team member within the bariatric surgery program
- agree to work under the direction of the bariatric surgery medical director
- agree to follow the institution's clinical guidelines for bariatric surgery
- agree to use the bariatric surgery informed decision program (an advanced version of informed consent)
- agree to participate in the bariatric surgery case presentation and continuing medical education (CME) programs established in conjunction with the CME director
- understand the need for enhanced documentation of the credentialing decisions that lead to the granting of clinical privileges
As you can see, the development of a bariatric surgery program is much more complicated than simply granting privileges to a qualified physician. The risks to the patient, physician, and institution are simply too great. Take steps that will minimize the likelihood that injury or misperceptions will lead to litigation.
That's all for this week.
All the best,
Hugh Greeley
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Q/A: Correct use of modifier -PT
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- "Wall fountains" may be spreading Legionnaires to patients, visitors
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Searched
