Two-year reappointment is crucial
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, September 3, 2003
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Dear Credentialing Colleague:
I often hear physicians and medical staff services professionals question the need for reappointment every two years. They often give the following reasons:
- Many medical staff offices continually re-verify licensure
- A lot of credentials information does not change within a two-year period (e.g., board status, medical school graduation, residency completion)
- Medical staff quality improvement programs constantly monitor physicians' performance, so if anything negative were identified, action would be taken immediately
All of these points are valid, but unconvincing. Unfortunately, not all physicians are subject to rigorous ongoing monitoring. We do not yet have a satisfactory "data alert system" for licensure actions, malpractice cases, and government sanctions that crop up unexpectedly. In urban settings, physicians often maintain affiliations with multiple hospitals, and no hospital has the resources to monitor each of those affiliations.
But perhaps most importantly, we should retain biannual reappointment to avoid privilege restrictions and denials. It gives the medical staff the chance to re-evaluate a physician's clinical ability to keep performing particular procedures and treatments. It's also an ideal time to provide physicians with feedback regarding his or her contributions to the institution, the medical staff, and the community.
Just as employees' annual (or biannual) performance evaluations set an important tone, so do reappointments. In the absence of true continuous feedback and supervision, reappointment forces us to take stock and reaffirm the commitment between the physician and the institution.
That's all for this week.
All the best,
Hugh Greeley
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched
