Handle rumors appropriately and promptly
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, May 14, 2003
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Dear Credentialing Colleague:
At first, the story starts out as a rumor. You hear people say, "Did you hear about Bill?" or "What a shame about Bill."
But soon the story becomes more definitive. Staff whisper, "I heard that Bill is under investigation at Memorial" Or perhaps, "Yep, the FBI walked right in and took his hard drive."
At that point, a mere rumor becomes a cause for concern, and the job facing hospital and medical staff leaders is clear. They must formally ask Bill to confirm or deny the situation. If Bill does indeed confirm the story, leadership should ask him to supply full details, including information from the original source, as well as documentation from the FBI, a notice of investigation at the other facility, etc.
Then, depending on the severity of the situation, the hospital must determine whether it can safely permit Bill to continue practicing medicine while a more formal review takes place. Leadership might have to ask Bill to step down during the investigation. If Bill doesn't readily accept this suggestion, you may have to enact a precautionary suspension, thereby giving the hospital and its medical staff leaders the opportunity to obtain full information, review that information, and determine a future course of action.
It's likely that Bill might object to these proceedings. But it shouldn't deter the hospital from taking necessary steps to protect patient safety and the institution's reputation; ensure compliance with the law; and assist Bill in minimizing future problems.
This week's letter is a tribute to an Illinois chief of staff who acted appropriately when confronted with a situation similar to that described above. He promptly discussed the issue with the chief executive officer, declared a potential conflict of interest (because Bill was his partner), recommended precautionary suspension, and actively participated in the subsequent medical staff investigation. Well done!
That's all for this week.
All the best,
Hugh Greeley
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Q/A: Correct use of modifier -PT
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Searched
