What to do when a physician resigns during an investigation
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, April 28, 2003
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Dear Credentialing Colleague:
"I'm fed up! Consider this my resignation. I'm out of here!"
A physician made this verbal proclamation to the chief of staff just after he learned that a special committee would investigate his clinical work. Apparently, the medical staff had serious concerns about the necessity of some surgical procedures performed by this physician. After nearly three months of "routine" peer review at the department level, the department chair requested a formal investigation in accordance with medical staff bylaws. The medical executive committee impaneled a special investigative committee and notified the physician.
Rather than hang around for the results of the investigation, the physician resigned from the medical staff and left town. The chief of staff now has two questions to answer: one easy, one more complex.
The first question: "Should we report this resignation to the National Practitioner Data Bank?" Unquestionably, the answer is "yes." This physician resigned during an investigation that could have led to restrictions or the revocation of his clinical privileges. It is clearly a reportable event.
The second question: "Should the medical staff continue with its investigation to create a full record of its concerns, deliberations, and findings in case the physician ever returns?"
The medical staff need not continue with this investigation unless it has a strong desire to do so. It should, however, place a formal letter or report in this physician's credentials file explaining that he resigned during an ongoing investigation. The hospital should maintain the details of the medical staff's concern, including patient record numbers, in this report or as part of the confidential peer review file "just in case" the physician has a change of heart and decides to return. The report should also note the fact that the physician delivered a "verbal resignation" to the chief of staff that was accepted by the MEC and board.
If this physician should return in the future, he should be notified that the medical staff office would not process his application until he has resolved all of the issues relevant to the quality of his previous work at the hospital.
That's all for this week.
All the best,
Hugh Greeley
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
