Addressing medical leaves of absence with FPPE
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, March 25, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Anne Roberts, CPMSM, CPCS, is the director of medical affairs at Children's Medical Center of Dallas, where she oversees the medical administration, graduate medical education, continuing medical education, research administration, and medical staff services departments.
Dear credentialing colleague,
Some MSPs are confused as to whether focused professional practice evaluations (FPPE) are required for medical staff members returning to work after a medical leave of absence. The answer depends on the type of medical leave the medical staff member was on and whether or not the member’s physician has requested accommodations in order for the member to return to practice. Having a clearly defined leave of absence policy is important and ensures that the appropriate steps are followed whenever a member goes on leave for any reason.
Members on short medical leaves, such as a maternity leave, typically don’t require monitoring upon return. However, if the member takes a year off to stay home with a child, for example, the medical staff should implement an FPPE process upon the member’s return. The department chief may want to accomplish FPPE by assigning a proctor or conducting chart reviews for a small percentage of the member’s patients upon return to practice after an extended leave.
If a member returns from a medical leave and his or her physician recommends accommodations (such as limiting the number of hours the member can work, specifying a certain shift, etc.) then it is up to the chief and the hospital to determine whether they can meet those accommodations. The chief also has the discretion to assign a FPPE depending on the circumstances. For example, if the chief has concerns regarding the practitioner’s competence, if the practitioner was on leave for an extended amount of time, or other justifiable reasons that the chief may feel additional monitoring would be prudent.
MSPs should also remember that anytime they are dealing with a medical leave of absence, they should review their impaired practitioner policy to determine whether or not the condition qualifies to be treated under the impaired practitioner policy. The hospital policy was likely developed in order to provide support and assistance to an impaired practitioner and to ensure that they are treated fairly.
Remember, clear, effective communication is the key to success!
That's all for this week.
All the best,
Anne Roberts, CPMSM, CPCS
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
