Ask the expert: How did the new specialty certification for child abuse pediatrics evolve?
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, October 29, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Have you ever wondered exactly how specialty boards develop new certifications? The evolution process for each certification share common elements.
In the case of child abuse pediatrics, a group of practitioners petitioned the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) to offer the certification, says Gail McGuiness, MD, executive vice president of the American Board of Pediatrics.
“There comes a point in time where it has matured enough where the practitioners will come to the board and say we wish to ask the board to consider giving a certificate, developing the process for the examination, and then, ultimately, for maintenance of certification in that area, and that’s what happened with child abuse,” says McGuinness.
Once the board receives the petition, it examines the field, including how many practitioners are practicing within this specialty, what professional groups and scholarly journals exist to promote it, and—most importantly, says McGuinness—whether the development of the new specialty will benefit children.
After the ABP votes to approve certification, it petitions the American Board of Medical Specialties, its umbrella organization, to offer the certification.
“By doing that, we hear from anyone who may disagree, who may think it’s not a good thing, may have a differing opinion,” she says. “Once it’s approved by ABMS, our board, not ABMS, develops the examination.”
ABP publishes the content outlines for subspecialty certifying examinations on its Web site. Practitioners can access this information for child abuse pediatrics at http://tinyurl.com/yh75bye.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched
