The potential impact of electronic medical records on MSPs
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, September 3, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Anne Roberts, CPMSM, CPCS, is the director of medical affairs at Children's Medical Center of Dallas, where she oversees the medical administration, graduate medical education, and medical staff services departments.
Dear credentialing colleague:
With many hospitals implementing electronic medical records (EMR) systems, there have been quite a number of questions in the field regarding what it means for MSPs. How, if at all, will it impact them?
An EMR is considered the legal medical record for a patient who is being cared for in an organization that has implemented an electronic system. EMRs have been developed for many reasons, including improving health care efficiency and safety.
So how does this impact the responsibilities of an MSP? Typically, MSPs are responsible for the orientation of medical staff members. When implementing an EMR system, there is a significant amount of training that medical staff members will have to complete in order to be deemed competent to begin using the EMR system. Many organizations are tying completion of this training to the medical staff members’ privileges; failure to complete the required training could result in suspension of clinical privileges. If a physician is not able to enter orders into the system or view a patient’s medication history, then patient safety is at risk.
In addition to coordinating the physician training, MSPs responsible for the medical staff governing documents, in particular the Medical Staff Rules & Regulations, should update them as needed to include EMR or determine if revisions to the existing content are needed.
MSPs may also see improved data collection due to EMRs because the systems allow organizations to better attribute data to the right care providers and to generate reports directly from the clinical system. In turn, MSPs may use this data for focused professional practice evaluations and ongoing professional performance evaluations.
Remember, clear, effective communication is the key to success!
That's all for this week.
All the best,
Anne Roberts, CPMSM, CPCS
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
