Conflict of interest disclosures
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, August 6, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Anne Roberts, CPMSM, CPCS, is the director of medical affairs at Children's Medical Center of Dallas, where she oversees the medical administration, graduate medical education, and medical staff services departments.
Dear credentialing colleague:
The Joint Commission revised its Leadership Standards to include requirements that leaders define and address existing or potential conflicts-of-interest related to licensed independent practitioners (LIP). Because of this, MSPs need to partner with their organization’s compliance department to determine how this will be implemented.
Many organizations are implementing it by including conflict-of-interest disclosures in their credentialing packets for LIP’s at initial and reappointment. Additionally, the hospital’s conflict-of-interest policy (or a Web address to access it online) can be included in the credentialing packet. General conflict-of-interest disclosures for all staff and LIPs should require that information related to existing or potential conflicts be disclosed, such as relationships with other care providers, educational institutions, manufacturers, and payers. If a physician discloses a potential conflict-of-interest during the credentialing process, MSPs should consult with their compliance or legal department to determine if additional information is needed.
Physician leaders or other LIPs who are in decision-making roles, or are in a position to influence decisions that impact the hospital, should complete more comprehensive conflict-of-interest disclosures annually. In addition to completing the conflict-of-interest disclosures, the leaders should be educated on how to identify potential conflicts-of-interest. When physicians are appointed to leadership roles, such as medical staff officers, committee chairs, or department chiefs, this information should be included in their orientation and education materials.
Remember, clear, effective communication is the key to success!
That's all for this week.
All the best,
Anne Roberts, CPMSM, CPCS
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
