How will your medical staff process additional FDA information?
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, June 11, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
The Food and Drug Agency (FDA) announced last week that it wants to open its doors and share more information with the public. But for medical staffs already overwhelmed with an abundance of information, not excluding the information they review when developing new technology privileges, will the FDA’s information really make an impact or will it be lost in the shuffle of other time-tested resources?
Chances are because the new information is coming from such an authoritative and trusted source as the FDA, your medical staff will want to hear about it. But that still leaves the challenge of how to manage extra information. The following are some tips to help streamline that process:
- If your medical staff already has a new technology assessment committee, assign specific research roles to several members. That way individual members can share their findings with the group rather than having members duplicate work.
- When archiving researched data, be sure to include the date the information was gathered on, the name of the person who collected it, and its source so that follow-up questions can be properly directed.
- Maintain a list of list of new technology research sources. Sometimes getting started is the hardest part of the research process, so maintaining a list of starting points can help overcome that hurdle.
Sincerely,
Emily Berry, associate editor
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
